Requests were received from Indian and foreign magazines/newspapers/publications for the advertisements which were processed by the publicity officer of the rank of Deputy Manager level and were put before the CMD/ED through the Senior Manager/Deputy General Manager for his approval. The procedure for release of advertisements on behalf of ITPO was as follows:
![soma lost judgment soma lost judgment](https://twinfinite.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Lost-Judgment-1-3.jpg)
Regular advertisements were given to the national dailies and other leading newspapers and magazines, whereas ad hoc advertisements were those which were issued on ad hoc basis from time to time with the specific approval of the Chief Managing Director or Executive Director only. There were two types of advertisements: (1) regular advertisements and (2) ad hoc advertisements. The prosecution case is that the publicity department of ITPO was concerned with the release of advertisements in newspapers. The appellant along with the other accused in this case allegedly entered into a criminal conspiracy and by misusing their official position caused undue pecuniary advantage to themselves to the tune of Rs 30,30,057 and caused a corresponding loss to the Indian Trade Promotion Organisation (ITPO) which is a wing of the Central Government, from whose account money was released against bogus receipts of advertisements which had actually never been carried by any newspaper or other publication.ĥ.
#Soma lost judgment code
63 of 2001, by which the appellant and two others had been charged for offences under Section 420 read with Sections 120-B, 429, 468 and 471 of the Penal Code as well as under various provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The criminal revision petition was filed in the High Court challenging the order of the Special Judge, Delhi in case titled CBI v.
![soma lost judgment soma lost judgment](https://twinfinite.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Lost-Judgment-Minigames-12.jpg)
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.Ĥ. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order of the Delhi High Court dated 22-10-2005 in Criminal Revision Petition No.